Відео

Something cool about hawaiin culture, is they had a mathematic base of four which I believe aided in the effects of ancient Hawaiin mysticism and magic. Also Basket Weaving is a talent and a half, those hats are rad

Now you are officialy Coconut class

was waiting for the math to come out😂

I was saying I wish he'd show one of those seeds sprouting and just then he showed one of the seeds sprouting. I grew a pineapple by rooting the cut off top. It grew a little pineapple on the end of a bendy piece of green I guess was like a branch but the pineapple looked like bait a little bigger than an acorn dangled from a fishing line. I grew it in a 3 liter coke bottle in part shade and just checked it about once a week to water. 🙂

this makes me want to try coconuts, i haven't had them in a really long time

I love coconut water, but the "meat" is weirdly dry and unpleasant to chew and swallow

_you give my life meaning_

maths are interesting

I love that our hat-weaving friend was so ready to share his mathematical knowledge about weaving! Math is truly all around us. I know you will treasure that hat for a long time. What a wonderful gift!

Tree: Oh, animals like eating me... well, take this fruit, ha!

Coconut. Mmmm

The editing is getting better with each episode

Man I am the 4th comment! Watching 10 minutes after being posted.

I say this in the best way possible: you are exactly what I imagine a very keen greek philosopher would be like. Just thinking about maths and about how to live a good life and just having interesting thoughts about nature. Really fun field trip, keep up the good work!!

Got to claim the Hawaii trip as a business expense somehow!

In this snack break / field trip, we will learn many things about coconuts.... (I'll also have a new mathematical episode out in about a week).

Seems like the ship of Theseus paradox. If we lose a chunk of our skin through an injury, are we still ourselves? We would be more different for from the infinitesimal difference of .9 recurring and 1. I love your point about the numbers we create as being representational. Love your work 🙂

Let's say you are asked to multiply two numbers which are not far away from each other. I'll take the Example with 21x28 First step: find the "middle number" between 1 and 8 middle number is either 4.5 So you can select anyone you want but I'll select always de smallest one; 4 in this case. Then 21x28 = 24x24 + 24 - (28-24)*(28-23) Thus: 24x24 + 24 - 4*3 Now, I dont know how much 24x24 is but I do know that: (a+b)² = a² + 2ab + b² hence: 24x24 = 20² + 2*20*4 + 4² And finally, 21x28 = 20² + 2*20*4 + 16 +24 - 12 = 20² + 188 = 588 If the two numbers are too far away like: 21x51,then: 21x51 = 21x25*2+21 and calculate 21x25 as 23² - 4 = 20² + 2*3*20 + 9 - 4 = 400+120+5=525 So: 525*2+21=1071 With Practise you can do this mentally pretty fasy

Can we prove collatz conjecture by induction method?

The math is pretty neat but I came here for the cat functions.

15:44 "using *fewer* ones," not "using less ones." Sorry for bringing this up, but it is one of my greatest pet peeves, the misuse of the word "less" when talking about items you can count. If you can count them, use the word "fewer" when describing a smaller quantity of them. Save the word "less" for when what you are talking about cannot be quantized, but instead refers to a general amount of something. "Less sand on the beach" versus "fewer grains of sand." "Less water in my glass than in yours" versus "fewer glasses of water on this table than on that table."

I have actually thought a lot about the section "What is the Largest Number We Can Build?" before seeing this video. I also came to the conclusion that you would be using 2s and 3s a lot. Wonderful video for those who like number theory and pure mathematics!

I love you baby

Nice easteregg with the -1/12

still waiting for base infinity

If infinity can be multiplied by 2 was it infinity to start with?

Wa33, we study this in highschool anyways… in arithmetics (aka the number theory)

Here are some axioms I could come up with General: 1. Odd number x Odd number is always results in an Odd number. 2. Adding 1 to an Odd number always makes it an Even number. 3. All Even numbers repeatedly divided by two will eventually turn into a Odd Number. Specific to 3x + 1: 1. In a 3x + 1 sequence the amount Odd numbers will always be less then the amount of Even numbers. 2. There is never two Odd Numbers in a row during a 3x + 1 sequence. 3. As the Even Numbers size increases the amount of divisions by 2 in the sequence increase.

thanks for doing this video. this is the math shit I used to fuck with as a kid before I started school. I used to think this is what doing math looked like. I still do, but I used to too.

can you mail me a bamboo stick?

This intro is how I imagine most math experiments go. My numbers always explode in my face whenever I try to do math as well.

ok, what if you are allowed to use exponents?

love your channel bud. t, math teacher

there are physical limitations to chess, it is solved

I have so much meta ranting I want to do about your productions. I love it, but lack and words to articulate what you’re doing. You’re like the anti-3blue1brown

this video is so scuffed and i love it xd

I don't want to set the world on fire~

I see. It’s not so unusual. Roman numerals used something similar to represent their 4s and 9s. This is the same concept but applied to the smallest base that allows it.

How high is this guy right now?

Ten should be called onety and eleven should be called onety-one

I didnt understand anything at all , i was just watching this wondering what does he smoke to act like this 😭

A clock with hands that spin faster than normal can be right multiple times a day.

The settings 😂

A lot of fire for a math video

This is literally just a set theory. Numbers a cardinality of sets of null.

I always called the multiplicative inverse the reciprocal.

It's so great to finally see a teaser for Return to Zork revamped in VR

Isn't this just "prime factorization" extended to include operations other than the usual multiplications? 4 = 2 * 2 (simple prime factorization, and the "cost" is simply the addition of factors) or 2 + 2 (4 ones) 5 = 2 * 2 + 1 (prime can't be factorized, so we include addition operation) or 1+1+1+1+1 (5 ones either way) And because each number can be written as x = 1 + 1 + ... x times, we can say that each number has a maximum cost of X ones. so, for 5, you can just write 5 ones. 6 = 2 * 3 (5 ones by using prime factorization). 7 = 2 * 3 + 1 (prime number can't be factorized, reuses cost of previous factorization and adds one) and so on. The whole (2^a) * (3^b) is simply a consequence of all prime numbers (greater than 3) being of the form 6k + 1 or 6k - 1.

This was such a spooky vibe.

What if you play on a cylinder? Then it wouldn't mater where the first piece goes.